Monday, September 9, 2013
Sunday, September 8, 2013
I wonder if the delay isn't so much the PTB as it is the queasiness of "the folks in the rafters" as to what comes next? Just sayin'..... :) As usual comments in red are mine... -Bill
Greetings and Salutations,
The waiting was to have been over long ago but the powers that be shifted all of that--one more time. Their ability to shift has been curtailed and the machinations are moving things albeit, very much slower than any of us had wanted. I am clear that I have said all that I can.
There is nothing new to report except that the prosperity programs and the attendant other programs are beyond any comprehension size wise and therefore, why would we be anything less than appreciative for the effort being put forth. What would life have been like without this event? Think about that. Go back to what it was like before you even knew anything about this? What would that mean for you today? Think about that. In the timing is everything and they do know what they are doing. The dragon family is aware and the others in europe are just as aware.
The feelings you are having are those of human ego and are natural. But for the sake of the society that will change and be better for them, hold your horses. This is not about you anyway. You seem to think that it is. No, it is about a shift in the thinking and in the mindset of people who will do what is best for their fellow man. How will that happen? That has been worked on behind the funny stage (scenes) for several years. Tried, explored, scrutinized and once more back to the drafting table. No reason not to trust that they know what they are doing.
From Zap.........
Hi All
It has indeed started, and all systems are on a hair trigger now to perform the reset and get us all breathing again.
The blackmail sequence of the Syrian conflict seems to be unraveling with many intelligence sources reporting on the true reality of the chemical attack. Seems that a few rockets would have killed more people, but there is nothing like a good old chemical attack to raise the hackles of the world and provide a landscape for war.
Now, who would want another war?
If a war happens, then the global settlements could be delayed, as well as the historic bond redemptions, the EV of the Dinar and Dong, etc.
So who would want a war?
Rest assured that the powers that are in charge now do not want a war. They will intervene as necessary I am told. Humanity must be allowed to evolve and fulfill its destiny, and this is the “prime directive” at the moment.
The september 3-5 start date has come, and it has started. the coming week, I think Wednesday is the target here, will see announcements and release of funds for the redemptions.
Washington is all prepped to get things underway with the other governments, and it should be a pretty good start for all of us waiting in the wings.
One very good question that came in is of interest here.
Zap, is the debt the Federal Reserve owes that has to be repaid in gold about to be called? I've heard that it will immediately bankrupt the Fed and is necessary to trigger Reset. Thanks
It is not necessary to bankrupt the FED to get the reset done. Even if the debt is called, there is ample gold in numerous caches in the USA to support the debt payout. Few know of these caches and the reality of the debt structure. [Interesting comment...the CAFR accounts? What happened to all the talk of the FED being closed down and the UST taking over?]
There is very little I can say at the moment, as the next 3 days will see the unfoldment of all that we have labored for. Thank you all for your hard work and tenacity.
In love and light in our service
Zap
“God is; I am; We are”
“Be good, Be legal, Tell truth”
Consultations upon request until the doorbell rings.
Love and Kisses,
Susan & Staff
Office of Poofness
P.S. Many of our loyal subscribers have had trouble receiving the newsletter this past month. I have sent them.....but our email service located in Tel Aviv seems to be having server problems which is causing us problems getting the newsletter out. [Last place I'd put a financial email server!] Please tell your friends to go to rumormillnews.com reading room to view the lattest newsletter if they do not get their copy. [or go to http://americankabuki.blogspot.com!]
Thanks, Susan
Rep. Amash: ‘If Americans Could Read Classified Docs, They’d Be Even More Against Syria Action’
http://www.thedailysheeple.com/rep-amash-if-americans-could-read-classified-docs-theyd-be-even-more-against-syria-action_092013
Melissa Melton
The Daily Sheeple
September 7th, 2013
Congressman Justin Amash (R-MI) has been a very outspoken opponent of any military intervention in Syria. He has been all over the media warning that we as a nation should not strike Syria, and he has even used social media sites to warn his fellow Congress members that if they vote for military action next week, they might as well clean out their desks because of unprecedented public opposition against it.
Now Rep. Amash has taken to Twitter to inform the American people that if we could read the classified documents touted by our White House to justify strikes in Syria, we’d be “even more against Syria action”.
The Tweet followed his admission that he was even more skeptical following another Syria briefing and a call for the Obama Administration to correct public statements that he claims are inconsistent with the information he received at the briefings because the “public must have facts”.
Rep. Amash was also vocal regarding the fact that many members of Congress were never briefed on the NSA’s surveillance programs that ignore the Constitution by collecting data on every single American citizen. Last summer Rep. Amash introduced an amendment that would have prevented the NSA from collecting data on Americans who are not currently under investigation, but it lost by a sorry 12 votes in the House, 205-217.
All the evidence indicates that Obama is not going to get Congressional approval for any military action against Syria during the vote next week. The president and his administration have been mum about what they will do in the event Congress votes against Syrian intervention. Obama has already said he does not believe he needs any Congressional approval to bomb Syria.
Delivered by The Daily Sheeple
Contributed by Melissa Melton of The Daily Sheeple.
Melissa Melton is a writer, researcher, and analyst for The Daily Sheeple and a co-creator of Truthstream Media. Wake the flock up!
Please share: Spread the word to sheeple far and wide
- See more at: http://www.thedailysheeple.com/rep-amash-if-americans-could-read-classified-docs-theyd-be-even-more-against-syria-action_092013#sthash.vTnjIprU.dpuf
High-Level U.S. Intelligence Officers: Syrian Government Didn’t Launch Chemical Weapons
Submitted by George Washington on 09/07/2013 02:09 -0400
Preface: Without doubt, intelligence is being manipulated to justify war against Syria. Here, here, here, here and here.
Without doubt, the Syrian rebels had access to chemical weapons … and have apparently used them in the recent past.
Associated Press reported last week:
An intercept of Syrian military officials discussing the strike was among low-level staff, with no direct evidence tying the attack back to an Assad insider or even a senior Syrian commander, the officials said.
So while Secretary of State John Kerry said Monday that links between the attack and the Assad government are “undeniable,” U.S. intelligence officials are not so certain that the suspected chemical attack was carried out on Assad’s orders, or even completely sure it was carried out by government forces, the officials said.
***
Another possibility that officials would hope to rule out: that stocks had fallen out of the government’s control and were deployed by rebels in a callous and calculated attempt to draw the West into the war.
Reuters notes today:
With the United States threatening to attack Syria, U.S. and allied intelligence services are still trying to work out who ordered the poison gas attack on rebel-held neighborhoods near Damascus.
No direct link to President Bashar al-Assad or his inner circle has been publicly demonstrated, and some U.S. sources say intelligence experts are not sure whether the Syrian leader knew of the attack before it was launched or was only informed about it afterward.
Indeed, numerous intelligence officers say that the rebels likely carried out the August 21st attack.
For example, the Daily Caller reports:
The Obama administration has selectively used intelligence to justify military strikes on Syria, former military officers with access to the original intelligence reports say, in a manner that goes far beyond what critics charged the Bush administration of doing in the run-up to the 2003 Iraq war.
According to these officers, who served in top positions in the United States, Britain, France, Israel, and Jordan, a Syrian military communication intercepted by Israel’s famed Unit 8200 electronic intelligence outfit has been doctored so that it leads a reader to just the opposite conclusion reached by the original report.
***
The doctored report was picked up on Israel’s Channel 2 TV on Aug. 24, then by Focus magazine in Germany, the Times of Israel, and eventually by The Cable in Washington, DC.
According to the doctored report, the chemical attack was carried out by the 155th Brigade of the 4th Armored Division of the Syrian Army, an elite unit commanded by Maher al-Assad, the president’s brother.
However, the original communication intercepted by Unit 8200 between a major in command of the rocket troops assigned to the 155th Brigade of the 4th Armored Division, and the general staff, shows just the opposite.
The general staff officer asked the major if he was responsible for the chemical weapons attack. From the tone of the conversation, it was clear that “the Syrian general staff were out of their minds with panic that an unauthorized strike had been launched by the 155th Brigade in express defiance of their instructions,” the former officers say.
According to the transcript of the original Unit 8200 report, the major “hotly denied firing any of his missiles” and invited the general staff to come and verify that all his weapons were present.
The report contains a note at the end that the major was interrogated by Syrian intelligence for three days, then returned to command of his unit. “All of his weapons were accounted for,” the report stated.
***
An Egyptian intelligence report describes a meeting in Turkey between military intelligence officials from Turkey and Qatar and Syrian rebels. One of the participants states, “there will be a game changing event on August 21st” that will “bring the U.S. into a bombing campaign” against the Syrian regime.
The chemical weapons strike on Moudhamiya, an area under rebel control, took place on August 21. “Egyptian military intelligence insists it was a combined Turkish/Qatar/rebel false flag operation,” said a source familiar with the report.
[A "false flag" is a ploy for starting war which has been used by governments around the world for thousands of years.]
Agents provacateurs are as old as warfare itself. What better than a false flag attack, staged by al Qaeda and its al Nusra front allies in Syria, to drag the United States into a war?
***
An Egyptian intelligence report describes a meeting in Turkey between military intelligence officials from Turkey and Qatar and Syrian rebels. One of the participants states, “there will be a game changing event on August 21st” that will “bring the U.S. into a bombing campaign” against the Syrian regime.
The chemical weapons strike on Moudhamiya, an area under rebel control, took place on August 21. “Egyptian military intelligence insists it was a combined Turkish/Qatar/rebel false flag operation,” said a source familiar with the report.
[A "false flag" is a ploy for starting war which has been used by governments around the world for thousands of years.]
Agents provacateurs are as old as warfare itself. What better than a false flag attack, staged by al Qaeda and its al Nusra front allies in Syria, to drag the United States into a war?
We regret to inform you that some of our former co-workers are telling us, categorically, that contrary to the claims of your administration, the most reliable intelligence shows that Bashar al-Assad was NOT responsible for the chemical incident that killed and injured Syrian civilians on August 21, and that British intelligence officials also know this. In writing this brief report, we choose to assume that you have not been fully informed because your advisers decided to afford you the opportunity for what is commonly known as “plausible denial.”
***
There is a growing body of evidence from numerous sources in the Middle East — mostly affiliated with the Syrian opposition and its supporters — providing a strong circumstantial case that the August 21 chemical incident was a pre-planned provocation by the Syrian opposition and its Saudi and Turkish supporters. The aim is reported to have been to create the kind of incident that would bring the United States into the war.
According to some reports, canisters containing chemical agent were brought into a suburb of Damascus, where they were then opened. Some people in the immediate vicinity died; others were injured.
We are unaware of any reliable evidence that a Syrian military rocket capable of carrying a chemical agent was fired into the area. In fact, we are aware of no reliable physical evidence to support the claim that this was a result of a strike by a Syrian military unit with expertise in chemical weapons.
In addition, we have learned that on August 13-14, 2013, Western-sponsored opposition forces in Turkey started advance preparations for a major, irregular military surge. Initial meetings between senior opposition military commanders and Qatari, Turkish and U.S. intelligence officials took place at the converted Turkish military garrison in Antakya, Hatay Province, now used as the command center and headquarters of the Free Syrian Army (FSA) and their foreign sponsors.
Senior opposition commanders who came from Istanbul pre-briefed the regional commanders on an imminent escalation in the fighting due to “a war-changing development,” which, in turn, would lead to a U.S.-led bombing of Syria.
At operations coordinating meetings at Antakya, attended by senior Turkish, Qatari and U.S. intelligence officials as well as senior commanders of the Syrian opposition, the Syrians were told that the bombing would start in a few days. Opposition leaders were ordered to prepare their forces quickly to exploit the U.S. bombing, march into Damascus, and remove the Bashar al-Assad government
The Qatari and Turkish intelligence officials assured the Syrian regional commanders that they would be provided with plenty of weapons for the coming offensive. And they were. A weapons distribution operation unprecedented in scope began in all opposition camps on August 21-23. The weapons were distributed from storehouses controlled by Qatari and Turkish intelligence under the tight supervision of U.S. intelligence officers.
On Sep 7, 2013, at 10:48 AM, Garret // Wayseers
Is it time to protest or pray? ...or both?
Here are some wise and inspiring words on "How to Stop the War":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLUx9oH_IVA
Maybe if this message gets around more, it could bring some sanity to our situation.
Find your local peace rally this weekend. Here's a list
Pray for the sanity of our leaders - that they put down their online poker games and pay attention to the actual long-term ramifications of what they are proposing.
We could be on the verge of World War III here...
With Russia and China taking sides with Syria, some are saying that this mess, if handled poorly, could trigger World War III. We don't even have our closest ally, the UK, in support of a strike. In fact about half of G20 countries are contesting that these chemical weapons could all be a staged ruse by extremist rebel forces (not the Syrian government) to trap the U.S. into fighting this war.
"War is a game that has gone too far." ~ John Lennon
We need more voices of reason, like this: http://youtu.be/ZLUx9oH_IVA
Peace,
Garret John LoPorto
Creator of the Wayseer Manifesto
Connect with me on Facebook & on Twitter
1. The OPPT was a legal tool to recapture value for the One People.
2. The OPPT is a reconciled entity, no longer active, its job having been finished for the purposes of legal filings.... The OPPT was never affiliated with the ITCCS.
3. The OPPT Trustees never signed any documents with Swissindo. Nor did they agree to Swissindo's "plan".
4. Swissindo is not the OPPT. They are whatever it is they are.
5. The OPPT has never asked for donations. It was self funded by the trustees.
6. Anyone asking for donations in the name of the OPPT is not the OPPT.
7. Many attempts have been made to co-opt the name and spirit of the OPPT. Sometimes by the same people who have attacked it. Sometimes by people who supported it. We love them all.
What others choose to BE and DO is their business. Just do it in complete transparency and honesty.
PS: (Heather's addition):
8. Heather Ann Tucci-Jarraf, Caleb Paul Skinner, and Hollis Randall Hillner were Trustees only over their respective values ....no one else's...they were just crazy enough to return every one else's value to them that was "hidden in plain sight" too.
The journey of our conscious expanding during that experience, at every moment a piece of data swung into focus and rattled perception(s), is a matter of public record....and NO... money/donations/bribes/barters were never requested/accepted/a part of the adventure or the revelation (the revealing) of prime energy....LOVE
I love you! ALL WAYS! YOU BE AWESOME!
PPS: Heather:
[9/7/13 5:16:35 PM] HeatherAnnTucciJarraf I: [12:50:21 AM] HeatherAnnTucciJarraf I: [Saturday, September 07, 2013 9:30 PM] Thomas M:
<<< From Brian's FB
Mel Ve:... Graham, ITCCS is linked to IUV and Heather through me.
Heather: interesting...who is Graham?....Seriously....I dunno.
I love the transparency that is becoming visible![9/7/13 5:17:11 PM] HeatherAnnTucciJarraf I: [1:11:36 AM] HeatherAnnTucciJarraf I: [12:52 AM] Steph:
<<< I believe Graham is someone that Mel is just replying to in a FB post...?
Heather: (whew)....question though:
If just speaking with someone links (or is it "binds") me to all their choices of networks, friends, and activities without notice and my conscious choice and consent....
...then should I worry about my conversation(s) with General Brigadier Jack Nevin (Advisor to the Pentagon), Wong Shui Lung (Chinese "Intelligence"), Brenda Stealey (semi-retired DOJ/Geneva Switzerland Trading Platform and ex-wife of CIA executive), Patrick Wang ((former?)Board of Director HSBC, who was later found secretly funding Triad, North Korea, and "God-only-knows how many other corporate-created thugs, I mean terrorists).
...sooooooooo friggin' many links!.....then there was also my 2nd grade teacher who just didn't look right, ya know, not human...HOLY CRAP!!!!!!!!!!
I am linked to..to...to... every inbodyment of One!!!!! .........oh, ok. No problem... I LOVE THE ABSOLUTE PLAN!!!!!!!!!!
http://www.theonion.com/articles/poll-majority-of-americans-approve-of-sending-cong,33752/
A majority of U.S. citizens believe congressional leaders in both the House and Senate must be sent to war-torn Syria immediately.
WASHINGTON—
As President Obama continues to push for a plan of limited military intervention in Syria, a new poll of Americans has found that though the nation remains wary over the prospect of becoming involved in another Middle Eastern war, the vast majority of U.S. citizens strongly approve of sending Congress to Syria.
The New York Times/CBS News poll showed that though just 1 in 4 Americans believe that the United States has a responsibility to intervene in the Syrian conflict, more than 90 percent of the public is convinced that putting all 535 representatives of the United States Congress on the ground in Syria—including Senate pro tempore Patrick Leahy, House Speaker John Boehner, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, and, in fact, all current members of the House and Senate—is the best course of action at this time.
“I believe it is in the best interest of the United States, and the global community as a whole, to move forward with the deployment of all U.S. congressional leaders to Syria immediately,” respondent Carol Abare, 50, said in the nationwide telephone survey, echoing the thoughts of an estimated 9 in 10 Americans who said they “strongly support” any plan of action that involves putting the U.S. House and Senate on the ground in the war-torn Middle Eastern state. “With violence intensifying every day, now is absolutely the right moment—the perfect moment, really—for the United States to send our legislators to the region.”
“In fact, my preference would have been for Congress to be deployed months ago,” she added.
Citing overwhelming support from the international community—including that of the Arab League, Turkey, and France, as well as Great Britain, Iraq, Iran, Russia, Japan, Mexico, China, and Canada, all of whom are reported to be unilaterally in favor of sending the U.S. Congress to Syria—the majority of survey respondents said they believe the United States should refocus its entire approach to Syria’s civil war on the ground deployment of U.S. senators and representatives, regardless of whether the Assad regime used chemical weapons or not.
In fact, 91 percent of those surveyed agreed that the active use of sarin gas attacks by the Syrian government would, if anything, only increase poll respondents’ desire to send Congress to Syria.
Public opinion was essentially unchanged when survey respondents were asked about a broader range of attacks, with more than 79 percent of Americans saying they would strongly support sending Congress to Syria in cases of bomb and missile attacks, 78 percent supporting intervention in cases of kidnappings and executions, and 75 percent saying representatives should be deployed in cases where government forces were found to have used torture.
When asked if they believe that Sen. Rand Paul should be deployed to Syria, 100 percent of respondents said yes.
“There’s no doubt in my mind that sending Congress to Syria—or, at the very least, sending the major congressional leaders in both parties—is the correct course of action,” survey respondent and Iraq war veteran Maj. Gen. John Mill said, noting that his opinion was informed by four tours of duty in which he saw dozens of close friends sustain physical as well as emotional injury and post-traumatic stress. “There is a clear solution to our problems staring us right in the face here, and we need to take action.”
“Sooner rather than later, too,” Mill added. “This war isn’t going to last forever.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
